I mean, I guess I technically must have heard this before, since I had read TCFC years ago, but I’ll be damned if it rang any bells. I didn’t really have an opinion on that matter, but I heard Price bring this up in an interview elsewhere and so I decided that alone was worth diving into. They go together.įor me, I got this specifically because he (Price) defended the claim that Nazareth was uninhabited at the time Jesus was supposedly living there. So, any would-be reader beware – this isn’t a generic book about counter-apologetics. As it is, reading this with the other is the only way to really get what’s going on. This is simply page after page of rebuttal to each and every point of fact or interpretation presented. I suppose this is what it’s like to piss off a scholar (and a member of the Jesus Seminar that Strobel poo-pooed all over in TCFC) and have him rip apart the arguments as presented. It really almost needs to be read as a companion to TCFC and not something to be read after, because without having one book open right along with the other it’s easy to get lost.
I can tell you right this second, all that crap that frustrated me about that one clearly frustrated Dr Robert Price as well. Okay – Religoquest 2016 continues - and this book is obviously meant as a point-for-point rebuttal to The Case for Christ (TCFC) that I reviewed the other day (my review? It was a shit book).
0 kommentar(er)
